Steve Brannan, Joel Arick & Ann Fullerton
Portland State University
Portland, OR
Overview
The National Camp Evaluation Project (NCEP) was a nationwide study
(14 states) that investigated the impact of residential camp programming
on the growth and development of campers with varying disabilities
and ages. In responding to recommendations from professionals
for improved research, the NCEP a) developed validated instruments
to conduct quantitative assessments of campers and b) employed
a comprehensive evaluation design (quantitative and qualitative
measures) to determine the effects of such outdoor programs on
camper achievements. A major thrust of the NCEP was measuring
the affective (socio-emotional) and the recreation skill (i.e.,
level of independence) dimensions of camper performance. The intent
of this abstract is to summarize the major research results regarding
the effects of residential camp experiences on such campers.
Methods
The NCEP included 15 summer residential camps from across the
nation (14 states) that specialize in serving campers with disabilities.
A total of 2,184 male and female campers participated in the study,
including 73 case study subjects representing campers from each
of the regional camps. Participating campers typically attended
one-week summer camp sessions and were enrolled in special education
programs during the year in their respective communities. Campers
representing a wide range of ages, disabilities, and levels of
functioning were selected for the study. The majority of campers
were mildly to severely disabled and ranged in age from 7 to 21
years. Approximately 94% of the camper population was comprised
of persons with an intellectual (50%), physical/health (23%),
or sensory impairment (21%). The evaluation of camper performance
relied primarily on the use of quantitative measures using project
validated rating scales: the Affective Behavior Scales for
the Disabled (ABSD) and the Outdoor Skills Inventory (OSI).
Qualitative measures (i.e., case studies) were also employed,
and used the Outdoor Case Study Method (OCSM) to extend,
complement, and validate the evaluation study. Camper test (ABSD
& OSI) and case study (OCSM) data were collected
using project supported research assistants to assist camp staff
at each site. Parents used the ABSD to complete pre-post
evaluations of their child (before and after attending camp);
counselors used the OSI to complete pre-post evaluations
of their campers (beginning and end of camp session); and on-site
research assistants used the OCSM to record observations
of campers during their session, and to conduct interviews with
counselors (end of camp session) and parents (1-3 weeks following
camp) regarding camper achievements.
Major Research Questions and Results
Question 1: What were the effects of residential camping
on the affective (socio-emotional) growth of campers as judged
by their parents on the ABSD?
Results: Significant camper growth was found in areas of independence, communication with others, self-esteem, social interactions, and domestic responsibility.
Question 2: What were the effects of residential camping on the outdoor recreation and living skills of campers as judged by their counselors on the OSI?
Results: The overall achievement level of campers (i.e., level of independence) was found to be relatively high at the end of camp in the areas of personal/social, self-help, nature/environmental, fitness/hiking, boating, swimming, arts/crafts, equestrian, ropes/challenge, and sports/games.
Question 3: What were the effects of residential camping on the affective and recreation/living skills performance of campers as judged by independent observers, and their counselors and parents on the OCSM?
Results: Impartial observers indicated campers displayed high levels of enjoyment and participation, and relatively high levels of skill in the majority of activities observed. Interviews with counselors and parents indicated the camp experience furthered their camper's (or child's) enjoyment, motivation, and level of participation, plus increased their case study subjects' level of personal development in various areas (i.e., self-reliance, self-esteem, social interactions, communication with others).
Conclusion
The NCEP conducted the first systematic research nationwide using
validated instrumentation to substantiate the benefits of residential
camp experiences on campers with varying ages, types of disability,
and levels of functioning. The use of both quantitative (ABSD
& OSI) and qualitative (OCSM) measures revealed
that campers made notable achievements in the affective and recreation/living
skill areas as judged by impartial observers, and their counselors
and parents. The finding that campers with more difficult challenges
(i.e, severely disabled) fully enjoyed camping and were able to
perform recreation skills at relatively high levels of independence
is important. Further, the finding that campers made positive
gains during camp in various areas ( self--reliance, independence,
communication, self-esteem, etc.) that carried over to home and
community settings is significant. It is also noteworthy that
the combined results of all measures revealed that increased independence
was a predominant outcome for the campers. Lastly, the research
results confirm the "power" of organized programs in
the out-of-doors, and, particularly, the contributions of one-week
residential camp programs to the growth and development of persons
with disabilities.